What Australia’s Most Complained-About Ad Tells Us About Brand Safety in APAC
Australia cleared Kia’s most-complained-about ad on technical grounds, revealing a critical gap between regulatory compliance and real brand risk for marketers.
Kia Australia's "zombie-proof" electric vehicle commercial attracted 86 complaints in 2025, making it the most complained-about advertisement in the country. Viewers cited frightening imagery and inappropriate timing during prime-time television (when kids are still watching, likely causing extra headaches for parents who need to put them to bed shortly after). Regulators cleared the ad of zombie-related concerns entirely.
The campaign was only penalized for showing a driverless vehicle, a technical violation of motor vehicle advertising standards. Meanwhile, the content that actually upset audiences passed without issue. This disconnect reveals a critical gap in how self-regulatory systems assess brand risk, particularly for marketers operating across Asia-Pacific markets with vastly different cultural sensitivities.
For executives managing regional brand portfolios, the implications extend beyond one controversial commercial. Australia's approach offers a case study in what happens when compliance frameworks prioritize technical code violations over genuine community sentiment.
When Compliance Diverges From Community Standards
Ad Standards Australia received nearly 5,000 complaints throughout 2025, yet dismissed 99.3% of them. The organization focuses on whether advertisements breach specific code provisions rather than whether they offend community sensibilities. This creates a paradox: brands can be technically compliant while generating a fair bit of public backlash.
The year's second most complained about advertisement, featuring a child picking his nose in a Dettol commercial, drew 70 complaints but was cleared entirely. A Caruso's Natural Health vaginal probiotic advertisement received 67 discrimination complaints, yet was ruled compliant. Youi Insurance's dating analogy commercial attracted 65 sexism complaints without any breach finding.
Greg Wallace, Ad Standards Executive Director, emphasized that "Australians prefer clever and creative advertising rather than deliberately provocative content." Yet the system he oversees rarely penalizes provocative content unless it violates narrow technical standards. Only two advertisements among 2025's top 10 most complained about were actually upheld for breaches.
This regulatory approach assumes that code compliance equals brand safety. It doesn't account for reputational damage, social media amplification of controversy, or the cumulative effect of audience alienation. For brands operating across multiple Asia-Pacific markets, this gap becomes exponentially more dangerous.
Leighton Cosseboom
The Asia-Pacific Risk Multiplier
Australia's self-regulatory model sits at one end of the Asia-Pacific spectrum. At the other end, markets like Singapore and India enforce statutory controls on advertising content, particularly around religious imagery, modesty standards, and cultural sensitivities. An advertisement cleared in Australia could trigger regulatory penalties, consumer boycotts, or government intervention elsewhere in the region.
Horror-themed marketing demonstrates this disparity clearly. Netflix's zombie-themed activations for shows like "All of Us Are Dead" included theme park experiences in Korea that commercialized trauma-coded narratives. Film scholar Ernest Mathijs notes that "zombies in Korean cinema encode historical trauma," yet these commercial activations proceeded without regulatory scrutiny of emotional impacts or trauma sensitivity.
ASUS ran a zombie apocalypse campaign in Taiwan in 2016, establishing precedent for horror-themed advertising in Asian markets. However, these campaigns typically lack the cultural trauma assessments that would be standard for other sensitive content categories. The regulatory vacuum around emotionally provocative content creates unpredictable brand risk.
Leighton Cosseboom
Quantifying the Brand Safety Gap
The statistics reveal the scale of this compliance-versus-sentiment divide. Despite millions of Australians watching television weekly, the highest complaint count for any single advertisement in 2025 was just 86. This might suggest minimal audience concern. But it actually indicates that formal complaint mechanisms capture only a fraction of genuine audience sentiment.
Social media amplification, consumer boycotts, and brand perception shifts don't require formal complaints to inflict damage. A brand cleared by regulators can still face significant commercial consequences. When 37 complaints about a Big W advertisement showing a blurred middle finger resulted in one of only two upheld breaches, it highlighted the arbitrary nature of what crosses regulatory thresholds versus what merely offends audiences.
For Asia-based marketers, this gap between measured complaints and actual brand impact becomes critical when operating across markets with different complaint cultures, regulatory frameworks, and social media penetration rates. A campaign generating 86 formal complaints in Australia might trigger thousands of social media posts in markets where formal complaint mechanisms are less accessible or culturally inappropriate.
Leighton Cosseboom
Building Cross-Market Brand Safety Frameworks
Rather than relying on single-market regulatory clearance, regional marketers need parallel systems that assess cultural risk independently from code compliance. This starts with pre-flight cultural risk scoring that evaluates creative concepts against market-specific sensitivities before production begins.
Social listening simulations can model potential audience reactions across target markets, identifying flashpoints that regulatory review might miss. These tools track sentiment patterns around similar content, cultural taboos, and emerging sensitivities that haven't yet codified into formal regulations.
Cross-market review councils bring together regional stakeholders to evaluate campaigns through multiple cultural lenses simultaneously. This prevents the false confidence that comes from clearing regulatory hurdles in a single market while remaining blind to risks elsewhere. The council structure should include market representatives who understand both formal regulations and informal cultural boundaries.
When evaluating crisis management partners, marketers should establish procurement criteria that go beyond regulatory expertise to include real-time social listening capabilities, cross-cultural crisis response experience, and demonstrated ROI from reputation protection rather than just compliance defense. The partner selection process should specifically assess their track record in managing cultural backlash that was technically compliant but commercially damaging.
These frameworks recognize that brand safety in Asia-Pacific requires managing community sentiment as actively as regulatory compliance. The most complained-about advertisements of 2025 demonstrate that self-regulation optimizes for code adherence, not audience trust. For marketers operating across diverse Asian markets, that distinction determines whether controversy becomes containable or catastrophic.
Want to stay up-to-date on the stories shaping Asia's media, marketing, and comms industry? Subscribe to Mission Media for exclusive insights, campaign deep-dives, and actionable intel.
